Levan Samushia: Collective punishment did not exist even in the early Middle Ages, and today they tell us that collective justice must take place! – You will not find a scrap of law in the lawsuit! This is a collection of bad intentions for the country

Levan Samushia: Collective punishment did not exist even in the early Middle Ages, and today they tell us that collective justice must take place! – You will not find a scrap of law in the lawsuit! This is a collection of bad intentions for the country

Collective justice and collective punishment did not exist even in the early Middle Ages, and today these people tell us that collective justice must take place! – In the constitutional lawsuit there is not even a separation, not even a boundary as to where the accusation against one party begins and where the accusation against another party ends! Individualization of acts is the ABC of law, but they could not do this, because even if they bring the world’s lawyers, they will not find and present anything of a legally compromising nature in relation to “Lelo,” – this was stated by Levan Samushia, a member of the party “Lelo – Strong Georgia,” at the Constitutional Court hearing.

Samushia emphasized that the lawsuit submitted to the Constitutional Court by the deputies of “Georgian Dream” from beginning to end contradicts the Constitution, the spirit of the Constitution, and is directed against the democratic order. According to Samushia’s explanation, in the constitutional lawsuit there is not “a single hint” that would confirm that the party “Lelo” is carrying out the list of impermissible acts that the Constitution of Georgia prohibits.

“In relation to ‘Lelo,’ not only the party’s actions and the chain of actions, but you cannot cite a single statement by the party’s members and decision-makers that contradicts the Constitution of Georgia and comes into conflict with the legislation of Georgia.

For modeling – let’s say that one or two members of some X party went astray; it is impossible for their action to be attributed to the party. This is an insult to law and the Constitution. I have no doubt about the competence of the persons presented here and I am far from the thought that these people do not know this, but the devil is hidden in the motives and the main things are the motives!

You correctly noted: – more law and less politics, but this constitutional lawsuit does not give me the opportunity for there to be more law and less politics! You will not find a scrap of law in the lawsuit! This is not a collection of political intentions – a collection of bad intentions for the country, to which Article 23 of the Constitution is tailored, however it has no connection with law and a constitutional lawsuit,” Levan Samushia stated at the court hearing.